Collins, S. (2019). Collective Responsibility Gaps. Journal of Business Ethics,154(4), 943-954. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3890-6
Which kinds of responsibility can we attribute to which kinds of collective, and why? In contrast, which kinds of collective responsibility can we not attribute—which kinds are ‘gappy’? This study provides a framework for answering these questions. It begins by distinguishing between three kinds of collective (diffuse, teleological, and agential) and three kinds of responsibility (causal, moral, and prospective). It then explains how gaps—i.e. cases where we cannot attribute the responsibility we might want to—appear to arise within each type of collective responsibility. It argues some of these gaps do not exist on closer inspection, at least for some collectives and some of the time.
Dianoia Institute of Philosophy
Open Access Journal Article
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.