Colledge, R. (2014). Rethinking disagreement: Philosophical incommensurability and meta-philosophy [accepted manuscript]. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy,18(2), 33-53. Canada: Canadian Society for Continental Philosophy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium201418217
Set in the context of the current interest among Analytic philosophers in the “epistemology of disagreement,” this paper explores the meta-philosophical problem of philosophical incommensurability. Motivated by Nietzsche’s provocative remark about philosophy as prejudices and desires of the heart “sifted and made abstract,” the paper first outlines the contours of the problem and then traces it through a series of examples. Drawing largely on the tradition of phenomenology and philosophical hermeneutics, a broadly Continental response to this formidable problem is suggested. Disagreement cannot be understood simply in terms of epistemological strategy, but needs to be regarded in a fundamentally hermeneutical light.
Open Access Journal Article