Rowland, R. (2016). Rescuing Companions in Guilt Arguments. The Philosophical Quarterly,66(262), 161-171. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqv070
Christopher Cowie has recently argued that companions in guilt arguments against the moral error theory that appeal to epistemic reasons cannot work. I show that such companions in guilt arguments can work if, as we have good reason to believe, moral reasons and epistemic reasons are instances of fundamentally the same relation.
Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry
Access may be restricted.