Verena Schadewaldt, Australian Catholic UniversityFollow
Elizabeth McInnes, Australian Catholic UniversityFollow
Simeon Dale, Australian Catholic UniversityFollow
Anoja Gunaratne, Australian Catholic UniversityFollow
Dominique A. Cadilhac
Sandy Middleton, Australian Catholic UniversityFollow
Schadewaldt, V., McElduff, B., D'Este, C., McInnes, E., Dale, S., Gunaratne, A., Squires, J., Cadilhac, D. A & Middleton, S. (2019). Validating the Alberta Context Tool in a multi-site Australian emergency department nurse population. PLoS One,14(4), 1-16. United States of America: Public Library of Science. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215153
The organisational context of healthcare settings has an essential role in how research evidence is used in clinical practice. The Alberta Context Tool (ACT) measures 10 concepts of organisational context with higher scores indicating a more positive work environment and potentially better use of research evidence in patient care. We assessed the psychometric properties of the ACT in Emergency Departments (EDs). This validation study was conducted as part of a multi-centre trial of triage, treatment and transfer (T3 Trial) of patients with stroke admitted to EDs. Stratified sampling with proportional allocation was used to recruit ED nurses from 26 participating hospitals at baseline. Nurses completed a survey containing the ACT. Structural validity was investigated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients. Item-rest correlations and the average inter-item correlations were also assessed. 558 ED nurses completed the survey, comprised of 433 surveys without missing data. Our exploratory factor analysis produced a 14-factor structure, explaining 62% of variance of organisational context. For eight of ten concepts, item loadings matched the factor structure of the original ACT. Confirmatory factor analysis of the 10 ACT concepts showed moderate model fit (p = 0.001, root mean square error of approximation: 0.049, standardised root mean squared residual: 0.048). Cronbach’s alphas showed very good internal consistency for nine of ten ACT concepts (α>0.7; 0.45–0.90). Item-rest correlations indicated that most ACT items (50 of 56 items) within any concept related well to the total score of the concept. Average inter-item correlations indicated potential redundant items for three concepts (feedback processes, leadership, staffing) that were above the threshold of 0.5. While identifying a few shortcomings for some ACT concepts in an ED context, the majority of findings confirm reliability and validity of the original ACT in an Australian population of ED nurses.
Nursing Research Institute
Open Access Journal Article
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.