Kanis, J. A, Harvey, N. C, Johansson, H., Odén, A., McCloskey, E. V & Leslie, WD. (2017). Overview of fracture prediction tools [accepted manuscript]. Journal of Clinical Densitometry: Assessment & Management of Musculoskeletal Health,20(3), 444-450. United States of America: Elsevier. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.013
The characterization of risk factors for fracture that contribute significantly to fracture risk, over and above that provided by the bone mineral density, has stimulated the development of risk assessment tools. The more adequately evaluated tools, all available online, include the FRAX® tool, the Garvan fracture risk calculator and, in the United Kingdom only, QFracture®. Differences in the input variables, output, and model construct give rise to marked differences in the computed risks from each calculator. Reasons for the differences include the derivation of fracture probability (FRAX) rather than incidence (Garvan and QFracture), limited calibration (Garvan), and inappropriate source information (QFracture). These differences need to be taken into account in the evaluation of assessment guidelines.
Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research
Open Access Journal Article
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.